wow, five days have passed since i last wrote. i'm not sure why, but things have been somewhat slow going. i guess some of my days have been dominated by meetings. i had an iep meeting to work out. i also attended a few meetings about matters of concern for our school. that really has been dominating the airwaves and social media of late, because it feels as though we're rushing forwards towards a disaster. i mean, we are really trying our best, but there is an undeniable risk that we cannot eliminate, no matter what, and everyone is fearful of what could happen. i honestly think that the failures from the top (the trump administration) lead to impossible burdens for everyone else. if our country had really worked on testing, then it would be possible to monitor to the degree where we could control exposure, etc. but many months in, the administration did nothing. and now, trump would like to pretend that the pandemic isn't happening, and isn't the worst it's ever been. forget about taking responsibility. he's just not that kind of person. you know, moral.
i also managed to do the taxes on april 15 (or 16). so things were a bit busy in terms of stuff like that.
*****
i've been kind of tired of late, like i'm walking through molasses. i don't know if it's the heat, or if it's something psychological. i honestly think that our entire country is suffering from tremendous stress of living with under this administration. i'm not being hyperbolic here. it is traumatic every day to read what new horror or travesty that he commits, and the gop allows... ah, but enough complaining.
*****
i tend to feel like i'm a little looser about things. maybe that's a good thing, maybe not. i tend to think that the artist does not live in the perfect house that he (or she) eventually constructs. that is, the end product (whatever it may be) may seem as though it were fashioned whole, as a "meant thing", as something thoroughly designed such that it seems as though god intended it... but the process is far more tenuous, risky, and messy. there is no assurance of arrival. there are several abortions. there is likely tremendous despair, unless, perhaps, you've powered through, and understand that an end is possible...
to believe too much in the myth of the perfect, as though you simply attain some entry into a rarefied field, and each action is iconic, and leads to consequence... to even begin to think of it as a narrative, i.e., "the story of how i wrote this story," as though each thought led to some successive consequence, or "learning," that eventually led to the finished product... that's never ever how it works. or at least it isn't how things operate in my experience... although i like to think it does.
i do believe in "tuning in" to something, like a muse or something. but it isn't experienced necessarily or always as some clear signal. rather, it is a hint, and a struggle... like a scrabbling through the dirt on an archaeological expedition... finding the edges of a coffin. finding the latch for the lid... all the while cutting up your hands and losing fingernails over the hard stones that you must scratch away the edges of and pry from the earth... (ah, if only i had my tools... but you never dreamed you would need to do this, and so you are always ALWAYS thoroughly unprepared for the reward of inspiration).
maybe i think this way because i'm listening to judy blume now (acclaimed children's author), and she, as she says, "scribbles" in notebooks on a given character, until some mysterious switch is turned and it becomes time to take the pieces and fragments that she's uncovered and somehow stitch them together to form a living body... i think david sedaris is similar, although for him, it sounds a bit less random and a bit less like opening oneself up to the vultures and ravens to drop scraps of the dead world, leavings of the psychopomps, and more like constructing a joke complete with punchline, and then trying it out on audiences, and refining the joke... i think sedaris is a bit more- how shall i put it- intentioned. even though, as i have mentioned previously, some of his work, like spirit world, seems to arrive at its conclusion as though a mist has arisen... but then again, i am mistaking product for process. i still think sedaris's process is a bit more structured.
*****
i finally finished "catcher in the rye" again (on the toilet). i had read it in high school, long ago. i had completely forgotten the portion near the end, where one of his teachers says to holden that "it is better to live humbly for a worthy cause than die for an unworthy one." i recall that those words had some sort of effect on me. i suppose that being a melodramatic teenager made me sympathize a lot with the idea of "dying for an unworthy cause." in fact, as i have often mentioned, i had this idea of "dying" and having my value only realized after i was gone... i guess it's kind of an immature idea, to feel like you hold a secret pain, and to give it up instantly means that you must vanish... it's so... teenager-y... but i guess, despite the smugness and arrogance of adulthood, i suspect we just repeat the same gesture, the same melodrama, only in more sophisticated ways.
maybe this blog is just a reiteration of that notion...
anyway, i recall reading towards the end of the book, and, maybe i was sick at the time or something, but i distinctly remember feeling "something" during the passages where holden was very sick, nauseous, or something, and he kept having the sensation of falling or sinking into the streets as he crossed them, and called out to his dead brother to save him each time...
i don't know. overall, i suppose it's an okay story. i think that sort of stylized writing wouldn't work nowadays, as i have said. but i could be wrong.
*****
i am also reading- and here i can write the name because i have the book right in front of me- ottessa moshfegh. i'm not sure what sort of person she is... i've read two of her stories... they are both short stories, written from entirely different perspectives... the first was about a woman struggling to come to terms with a divorce... the second with this pervy chinese man who uses prostitutes to come to terms with the imperfections of this idealized woman he's trying to seduce... i don't know, the latter story left a dirty taste in my mouth.
the style of writing changes completely from the first to the second story. whereas the first story used terse sentences, the second sometimes had a sort of lengthy, meandering way to it (wandering over a shithole chinese countryside, if you ask me... or it could've been some rural thai village... i don't know).
*****
well, enough. i've got to move on to my "scribbling."