on sunday, we finished a 12-week writing workshop. it was a wonderful experience. for the first 6 weeks or so, it was more about timed writing to impromptu prompts (is that an oxymoron?). sometimes it was words, sometimes situations. we had to write everything in dialogue format, because i guess it was a writing workshop primarily geared towards writing screenplays. and besides that, i suppose that dialogue (and related action) really drives a plot, and distills it into the visible. a lot of that narrative, expository crap that i'm into (still am, unfortunately), it bores the pants off of audiences...
so, yeah, the first 6 weeks was like that. and then the last 6 weeks, we had writing "homework," where we had to bring in 4 pages to do a read-through. i think it was good for me, ultimately, because the workshop held me accountable to do that regular writing. i mean, i have been trying to routinize writing, but i suppose by having it actually "read" by other people, well, i guess it made it more official or something. anyway, i thought i started out okay. i decided to work on "kappa noodle," which is a story i'm writing about my relationship with my older brother. i know i still have a lot of raw feelings about my stinking brother. i have a lot of unresolved hatred. probably misplaced, but it's all there, nonetheless...
(did i mention? maybe in previous posts: but just to be clear, i haven't spoken to my brother in like ten years now. it all had something to do with my daughter and his son, just a little misunderstanding, but my brother and his scheming wife overblew it... and then started to get into hypocrisy territory. because while he was defending the honor of his then seven year old son, and started talking about "honesty," and started likening my daughter to my criminal sister, well, he neglected to mention about how when my sister was seven, he apparently molested her, and then after confessing to it, started backtracking and saying how that was a "lie." i suppose a lot of that sort of blew up in my face... it's funny, how i had, and my family had, up to that point, "buried" the issue... my sister was a fuck-up, it was all her fault, we never really, really believed her anyway, did we? and my brother was the (is the) upstanding citizen, great father, defender of honor. bullshit. BULLSHIT. i suppose that, in writing this story, i explored a lot of the ways in which my older brother sort of always was like that. i know that the story has been colored by my negative present perceptions of him and his family... and i have struggled, really struggled, to make him more redeeming than he perhaps was... but...
in a lot of ways, the story is a trial. my brother is being put on trial. and the voices of the two "lawyers," one yagoro and one kappa-chino, are the two voices in my head. kappa-chino's voice is the one talking about how i SHOULD hate my brother, i should rip his world to shreds... while yagoro, while not overtly defending my brother, claims i should sort of let it all go, keep going with my life... i don't do a good job of it, i think i wasn't particularly clear about where i was going with it, but in retrospect, i think that's what it all boils down to. should i kill my brother? or should i just move on?
[by the way, moving on means burying something... in the story, it doesn't really have anything to do with my sister, it all focuses on MY personal relationship with him... but, yes, it has something to do with burying a part of myself. my hatred for him.]
it's hard for me to relate any more to the love and respect i had for him. yes, on the surface, he is respectable. and, no matter what i or anyone says, he does work hard, he does stress out a lot, he has enormous passion and talent... all of that is incontrovertible. but i suppose what i wanted to point out was that it comes at a cost. and it comes with a theft. a fundamental hypocrisy. someone pays the price for it. someone always does. and it is the invisible people, like me, or my sister, who pay for it.
*****
ANYWAY. whew. i really started to loathe my story after the 12th week of the workshop. in the end, i think it was good that i was forced to regurgitate all of that. i know it was inconsistent, really wordy, really- boring. exhausting, really... but as i wrote it, i think i started to get a clearer picture of how to clothe this idea in a plot. because, up until that point, all i had were these images- not really full incidents, more like little memories, divorced from context... like pictures at an exhibition or something. and i didn't have the skill or whatever to weave them all together into a single narrative. to be honest, i wasn't (and still aren't) sure exactly what impression i wanted to give of the characters. i wanted to express ambiguity. but ambiguity is a tricky thing. if done right, the audience feels the internal conflicts. the hypocrisy. but if done wrong, the audience just gets lost and disconnected, like: "where the fuck is he going with all of this?" i actually think i strayed into the latter territory, because, to be honest, i really wasn't sure where i was going. this, even though i have been wrestling with this story on and off for like years.
right now, i have a few ideas for how to improve the story. first of all, as i have these two characters, stuffed animals named dd and owlie, who are ostensibly his only and imaginary friends... and as they don't really have anything to say during the "trial" portion of the play... well, i was thinking of having them be in a parallel storyline. perhaps when the main character "falls down the well," so to speak, into this other world, well, he gets separated from his "friends." and while the main character undergoes this trial (which, apparently, is a great device for this sort of exploration of memories... because you can jump into and out of them, and then have a debate over what it all meant)... a trial being a very static, stationary event... well, the other two characters are having an actual journey, through physical trials, to reach and reunite with the main character... i think it could potentially accomplish a few things: give those two characters more "living" parts; create a sense of journey in tandem with the trial, because the trial itself may seem so non-moving; provide opportunities for more resonant discussions and images, that could "inform" the events of the trial... anyway, that's the idea for now. because, again, after my 12th week performance, i almost thought of divorcing myself from this effort once again.
*****
i've been listening more to david mamet. while i hear there is controversy about his hyper-masculine plays (because, apparently, that's what his plays tend to be like), i do like his hard and fast discussions about the structure of plots... and the need to keep and maintain the trust of the audience. stuff like, if you don't win your audience over early, then they won't be willing to suspend their ignorance and wait for you to tell your story later... so you need to hit them hard and fast with a good joke in the early part of the play. (he likens plots to jokes with clear punchlines- only essential information reaches the punchline).
*****
i've been reading 3 books at once: dh lawrence's "sons and lovers", which, apparently, is his most autobiographical work... although he was known for scandalous, pornographic works like "lady chatterly's lover..." it's okay so far. i wasn't sure where he was going with it, and it took me a while to develop a liking to the style. sometimes it's hard to translate the- i don't know, scottish? english? speech. especially the speech of morel, the miner (father).
i've also been reading "olive kitteredge." in this latest chapter, she attends the funeral of a former student... or, rather, the former student was the widow. it was- interesting. but it is a chapter about how she continues to struggle with her life, or absence of a life, now that her husband is essentially a living shell of himself after his stroke, and her son voluntarily estranges himself from her in her moment of need... she is coming to terms with a life gone astray. she actually has considered suicide. and perhaps her limited interactions with people all have to do with trying to "place" herself on this spectrum of suffering. maybe she wants to find someone who has it worse. to gloat? or to take notes on how to continue to live? the oddest moment was when the widow matter-of-factly takes a paring knife and considers seriously killing one of the funeral guests... and how olive casually walks her back from this...
i've also read a chapter in "cloud in the shape of a girl." this was the strangest chapter yet. it was about how grace, the daughter, is trying to come to terms with her life after her mother's death. how she has to somehow keep the family going, if not restoring them to their previous unstable unity. in the process, at the end, she has sex with this gross, goofy older man named les moore... it's not as though she wants to. it's almost just this inevitability or something. i look upon this as grace living through the karma of her mother and grandmother, who were both unhappy, and at one point, both had extramarital affairs with unlikely characters... (grace's (real) father, in fact, was one of those)... i think grace was pulled along by this shape of destiny, or something...
*****
but aren't we all...